Skip to main content

Reading To Understand 'The Other': A Beginning

The Canadian literary theorist, Northrop Frye, in his small but important book, The Educated Imagination writes: "...Literature keeps presenting the most vicious things to us as entertainment, but what it appeals to is not any pleasure in these things, but the exhilaration of standing apart from them and being able to see them for what they are because they aren't really happening. The more exposed we are to this, the less likely we are to find an unthinking pleasure in cruel or evil things".

I would add that when we read cross culturally we become exposed to the thoughts and experiences of people that we might normally never come in contact with in our daily lives beyond a superficial contact. Reading allows us to form opinions, pose questions, and see another point of view that adds to, or changes our previous perceptions.

When I reached graduate school I was quite surprised by how many fellow students had not read cross culturally beyond what might be touted on a bestseller list of books to read. I had, in the course of my academic life, taken numerous classes that where designed to get students to read 'the classics'. Classes that taught African American literature where thought of as being special interest and therefore perhaps only relevant to those that might be African American. Classics are considered as suitable for everyone and African American literature was for African Americans. The very nature of the word 'Classic,' in this context, suggests that if something is not in this category then it is not classic and perhaps even more so, not relevant.

I am interested in the behaviour of racism. How does racist behaviour manifest itself? What does it look like? What is its behaviour from one person to another? I believe fully in the words of Frye. Literature can teach us about the most vile of things in such a way that we have no actual need to participate in the cruel manner which may be depicted.

But what happens if literature, that is deemed not a part of the classics, goes unread? How do we learn what another person feels or thinks, what their experiences are, if we don't expose ourselves to the words and experiences of the subaltern?

When I read The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn for the first time I did so as a student. I was the sole person of colour in the class. When the time came to discuss what we had read, I became convinced that I had read a different book than my fellow classmates. My classmates had read the book and deemed it a book about Huckleberry Finn. I read the book and thought it a story about Nigger Jim having to depend upon his survival from a child. It was also in this story that I watched a young boy, Huckleberry Finn grapple with his notions about slavery and come to change his viewpoint about Black people (during the time of slavery) and slavery itself. Huck had spent enough time exposed to Jim in the course of their adventures to come to the conclusion that he was no different from anyone else. Literature has the capacity to teach us how to be more humane. It has the power to reveal truths to readers in remote places, isolated circumstances and change the minds of those that hold ideas based upon preconceived thought patterns.

Over time I hope to write various essays that look at literature and to reveal what imaginary characters upon a page can teach us in our very real, everyday lives.

To end this short essay, I would like to suggest other classics that are important literary texts towards the understanding of the 'other'.

Suggested Readings:

Invisible Man - Ralph Ellison (An allegory on the experience of the African American Male)
Nobody Knows My Name - James Baldwin (Essays on the subject of being black in America)
A Small Place - Jamaica Kincaid (A must read for those that travel to host countries populated by Black peoples) (A must read of anyone interested in who those people are that seem to exploit you when you travel).




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Diane Tose 1942-2020

  In part, Diane’s passing marks the end of an era. The end of a time in history when the work in HIV research was experimental and run by mavericks. Diane was a ‘maverick’ in the truest sense of the word. We all were no matter the discipline we worked in. We were trailblazers. Diane was a complex woman. If you didn’t come to know her she was just a tall British woman who put the fear of God in you. She was pragmatic, demanding, and proudly British, even though she confided in me that she felt much more American than British. Diane liked things just so. An inch either way would be enough for her to voice a strong opinion. Opinionated women can often be alarming, but in Diane I found a heroine. I admired and looked up to Diane. She was no-nonsense. I can remember her calling patients into her office for pelvic examinations with a loudly overheard: Let’s have a look-see, or a get those feet up in the stirrups. I am sure that had she been a man she’d have been reported into oblivion, but

My Plantation Sown With Sorrow

  I recently found this academic paper while going through things in my home. It is a book review of Dorothy West's novel, The Wedding. It was written sometime between 1994-97 when I was working with the Dean of Empire State College,  James H. Case , who served as my mentor. I do not know how to put footnotes in Blogger so I will be using asterisks with an associated number which can be found at the end of the piece.  Two days ago I closed Dorothy West's book, The Wedding, and fell straight to sleep. I had a dream. I was out shopping but had an appointment with E's therapist later in the day. I was supposed to meet E there.  I called twice to say I would be late and finally arrived when the session was over. When I arrive, E and the therapist are friendly. The therapist tells us of a party we might be interested in going to later that very evening. E and I agree to go. We arrived at the party and I immediately split to go sit with the gay men and begin to yuck it up as onl

Consider This

 This post was inspired by my dear friend Sue, a psychoanalyst on the west coast of the US. It was a conversation we recently had where she asked me how I control or deal with being bipolar. She said that my experience was important and that I should write about it. So here we go. I’ve been in therapy on and off for 50 years. Periodically I return to therapy when I need to tease something out that is going on with me where I want a second voice. In another conversation with Sue I asked her if someone could be given a diagnosis at one time and with therapy work through and out of that diagnosis into either another diagnosis or to more awareness, self reflection and control over the things that led you to therapy in the first place. She responded with an emphatic: Yes. Think of it this way: A diagnosis helps to focus your awareness to go further towards your healing and self awareness; gathering self respect along the way. Your awareness expands within the diagnosis and with that expansi